Sites- JB- US- Site. JBL Pro. Playback the last 7. JBL Professional. Today, JBL Pro sound is heard in 7. Throughout those 7. JBL loudspeakers continue to be the one benchmark for quality, the singular reference for accuracy in the play back of recorded sounds; the leader, the innovator, the authority. Find great deals on eBay for jbl 4331a and jbl l300. Shop with confidence. Anti-Cables Level 2 Reference series interconnects; FOR SALE: Moving sale-JBL LX55 Floor standing tower speaker; User. JBL 4331A Professional Monitor Speakers. JBL 4331A Professional Monitor Speakers Photo. Canuck Audio Mart is FREE! 1950 JBL Product Lineup: John Edwards: May 25, 2000. JBL 4330/4331 Professional Studio Monitor. JBL 2405 Professional Series Ultra High Frequency Transducer. JBL 4. 31. 1B Loudspeaker: Could I tell these from L- 1. Pros: efficient; beautiful wood veneer; durable; can play loud. Cons: too much upper midrange energy; shallow soundstage depth; disappointing micro- dynamics. I don't think I'd heard of the JBL 4. B until I refinished a couple of pairs recently for someone here in the Bay Area. I am told that they are studio monitors that more- or- less replaced the famous JBL L- 1. JBL Professional Series Loudspeakers and Electronics. I he produc 5, r S'nte In this (~ 1.10 standards lor prof ssional soun rO.L- 1. 00, while the midrange is slightly improved. Aesthetically, they're fairly similar to the L- 1. The grilles themselves are generally tasteful black cloth, rather than the tacky egg cartons of many '7. JBL L- 1. 00s. The 4. Bs are large bookshelf- style speakers, measuring 2. They are finished in beautiful (and easily restored) walnut veneer, and weigh about 4. As with the L- 1. Because they are ported speakers, they are expected to be efficient, but with only moderate bass extension. Pairs of JBL 4. 31. Bs sell on e. Bay for anywhere from $2. Readers of my vintage loudspeaker reviews know that I'm more of a fan of the . The L- 1. 00s sounded dynamic, punchy and bright in my system, but they never fully sounded like music to me, and I was glad to get back to my Dynaco A- 2. KLH 6s, AR- 2axs, New Large Advents and (reference) Cambridge Soundworks Towers when the L- 1. I thought it would be interesting to see how the slightly more . The push pins on the back are relatively small and aren't as easy to use as the banana plugs of Dynacos or the thumb screws of ARs, KLHs or Advents (unless you use really small gauge wire). The speakers are large, dense, and bit . The mid and treble controls on the front had a nice firm feel to them and functioned well. Aesthetics. The JBL 4. I think. Most of my vintage audio buddies and I agree that JBL and Acoustic Research had some of the nicest veneer on their speakers during the 1. Bs is no less beautiful than that of the earlier L- 1. It tends to be dark and rich- looking, with interesting grain. The grilles of the 4. The two- inch bottom panel holding the mid and treble controls is tastefully done. Listening. I did my listening with the speakers mounted on 2. Associated equipment for this review included: NAD 5. BEE CD player, AR ES- 1 turntable with Shure M9. E cartridge, conrad- johnson MF- 8. NAD 1. 02. 0 preamplifier, and an M& K V- 2. B subwoofer. The first CD I put on with the JBL 4. Bs was Standards, Volume 2, by the Keith Jarrett Trio. This extremely well- recorded jazz trio recording is a good reference CD, as it presents drums, acoustic bass, and Jarrett's piano in a nice, neutral acoustic setting. From my kitchen (the . JBL Incorporated, 8500 Balboa Boulevard, P.O. Box 2200, Northridge, California 91329 U.S.A. Technical Manual JBL4331B SPECIFICATIONS 55519 REV C 08-03. 4331/4333 Two/Three-Way Studio Monitors Circa 1977 Courtesy of Greg Timbers © Harman International. JBL Pro is the world's leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of professional loudspeakers for musicians, contracting, tours, cinema and recording & broadcasting. JBL 4331 4331a for sale. For sale is a pair of beautiful JBL 4331a's with original drivers with walnut. JBL 4331 4331a Vintage Monitor Pair Bi-Ampable Before returning to my listening seat, I dropped the mid control to 1. I prefer a little extra image depth over . Jack De. Johnette's drums are presented with a pretty good amount of snap, and I can hear bassist Gary Peacock's individual bass notes. However, as with the JBL L- 1. In addition, there is not as much air around the cymbals as I've grown used to with my Cambridge Soundworks Towers. I decided to try something completely different: some of Gordon Lightfoot's earlier (pre- Reprise) recordings. These aren't particularly well- recorded, but I wanted to see how the JBLs would capture Lightfoot's guitar and vocals. As I listen, his voice sounds fairly neutral, but with a noticeable edge to the vocals. I believe this edge to be on the recording, but it is slightly exagggerated by the 4. Bs. It's with classical music that the KLH 6s, with their slightly warm and round sound, really excelled. As I listen to a Romantic symphony (one I don't know) on the JBL 4. Bs, the overall balance is good, and flute sounds particularly sweet, but I notice that micro- dynamcis seem a bit compromised. I'm not hearing the subtle things that make massed cellos sound real, and the music sounds a bit compressed overall, even though the JBLs have no trouble playing loud. I also wish there was a bit more low bass . To be fair, I have the speakers on stands several feet from the nearest wall, but that didn't bother my KLH 6s or Acoustic Research AR- 2axs quite as much. The guitar sounds pretty good overall, but there is more grain and less space than I would like. I miss my Dynaco A- 2. New Large Advents as I listen to this one. OK- -these are supposed to be rock speakers. Enter Tom Petty's Wildflowers. I'd been listening in my truck, so I brought it in. What surprises me as I listen is that even on rock, the 4. Bs continue to sound a bit midrangy and compressed. As I crank up the volume, the 4. Bs maintain their composure, but I don't find myself getting into the music. I decided to do an unusual (for me) comparison. Usually I compare whatever I'm listening to with my . This time I took the 4. Bs down and replaced them with my early ADS 4. The first thing I noticed was that overall clarity increased with the ADSs. Music sounded cleaner and better defined through the little 4. They also seemed to have less upper midrange energy and more extension in the highs. Image depth was much greater, and the soundstage now spread behind the speakers. Cymbals in jazz and rock music also sounded more natural. I much preferred listening to music through the ADS 4. Conclusions. To be honest, I'm not sure that I could tell the 4. B from the JBL L- 1. Both struck me as bright and punchy but lacking in soundstage depth and articulation. I was surprised that things like drum rim shots and cymbals did not sound better through the JBLs. To their credit, they are efficient, and you don't need a lot of power to drive them (though I've read on some blogs that they sound best with lots of power), but they just don't sound as musical to me as the best vintage loudspeakers. Interestingly, their upper midrange peak (if that's what I'm hearing) might make them work as recording studio monitors, and that is what they were designed to be. Although they're not very revealing of soundstage depth or micro- dynamic contrasts, they are revealing of upper midrange problems in recordings. Whereas some speakers smoothe over problems in the critical midrange, the JBL 4. But this characteristic means I couldn't enjoy the music as much as I could with several other speakers. They also are quite efficient and play loud without strain. As such, I'd think they would make good party speakers. My little ADS 4. 00s would probably burn up at volume levels that wouldn't bother the JBL 4. Bs. The JBLs also tend to be quite durable. Like Dynaco A- 2. AR and all Advent speakers. And they don't have the midrange and tweeter control (continuous potentiometer) problems that plague older AR speakers. The 4. 31. 1Bs also have collector value; there are JBL buffs out there who love to collect and restore them. If you can score a pair on the cheap and fix them up, I'd say it's worth it to do so. But for a speaker to serve as the voice of a high quality vintage system, I'd much prefer Dynaco A- 2. Acoustic Research AR- 2axs (good all- around speakers, but beware those midrange and tweeter pot problems), New Large Advents (also good all- around speakers, but often in need of a woofer refoam), or KLH 6s (especially for classical music). If you like the more efficient and more aggressive West Coast sound, I'd opt for a pair of Klipsch Heresys over JBL L- 1. Bs. As with the better- known JBL L- 1. I'll give these a guarded recommendation for partiers and collectors at 3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |